[Bug] Three file paths in GIT_STORAGE.md name files that do not exist #637
Labels
No labels
accepted
bug
declined
docs
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
in-progress
needs-info
privacy
security
triage
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
LibreKAT/Ocideck#637
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Found in the pre-publication documentation review.
Evidence: a script over 242 backtick-quoted paths in the public documentation found 15 non-existent paths, of which 12 are legitimate (future paths in the two unbuilt designs,
COLLABORATION.mdandPROCESS_IMPROVEMENT.md). The other three are indocs/design/GIT_STORAGE.md:1102-1106— a document that states phases 0-6 have landed and that it is "written to be picked up cold: exact file paths…":native_git_mirror.dart— exists asnative_git_mirror_io.dart/_api/_factory/_stubdraft_mirror.dart— exists asdraft_store*.dart(4 files)git_cli_stub.dart— exists asgit_cli_web.dartThe implementation is there; the names changed during construction and the map was not updated.
Why this matters: small, but it hits exactly the promise that document makes in its opening lines, and it is the one document where a wrong path leads a reader to conclude the feature does not exist. Five minutes of work.
Proposal: correct the three lines to the real filenames with a
*(Corrected …)*note per the house style. Consider afterwards a gate intool/that checks backtick-quoted paths tolib/indocs/for existence, with the 12 design paths on a baseline, so this class of drift cannot recur.Opgelost in `
cc00070` (PR #655).De drie paden wijzen nu naar
native_git_mirror_io.dart,draft_store.dartengit_cli_web.dart, met vermelding van de_api/_factory/_stub-broers ernaast, plus een gedateerde correctienotitie.De voorgestelde poort in
tool/die backtick-paden naarlib/toetst zit hier niet in — dat is code en verdient een eigen afweging (de twaalf legitieme toekomstige paden in de ongebouwde ontwerpen zouden een basislijst nodig hebben).